Internal Readiness Checklist
Pre-internal-launch gate
Use this page as the internal readiness gate before Builder Insights is treated as a real internal platform. The goal is not perfection. The goal is to make identity, hosting, telemetry, and governance risks explicit before broader internal rollout.
Ready means
- identity is trustworthy
- org-aware access is defensible
- internal runtime is supportable
- telemetry and ownership are real
Identity and access readiness
The app should rely on an approved internal sign-in path rather than an ad hoc or transitional login model.
- [ ] Okta SSO path is defined
- [ ] approved claims or groups for entitlement mapping are documented
- [ ] session and MFA expectations are understood
- [ ] break-glass admin policy exists
The app should know who belongs to Builder Relations and what access should follow from that.
- [ ] authoritative source for Builder Relations membership is identified
- [ ] manager and leadership chain handling is defined if needed
- [ ] entitlement exceptions are documented and reviewable
- [ ] role-mapping ownership is assigned
Hosting and deployment readiness
Internal runtime assumptions should be explicit before the product is treated as operationally stable.
- [ ] first Kanopy-hosted workloads are identified
- [ ] ingress, DNS, and callback URLs are planned
- [ ] environment boundaries are defined
- [ ] secrets and config management approach is approved
The team should be able to deploy, verify, and recover without improvising the whole process.
- [ ] health checks exist
- [ ] deployment verification checklist exists
- [ ] rollback expectation is defined
- [ ] runtime ownership is assigned
Observability and audit readiness
The team should know when auth, sync, API, or queue behavior degrades before users report it.
- [ ] structured logs exist for core request paths
- [ ] auth, sync, and API health metrics are defined
- [ ] alerts exist for major reliability regressions
- [ ] telemetry collection path is approved for internal hosting
The platform should be measurable from product, operational, and access-governance perspectives.
- [ ] core usage metrics are defined
- [ ] audit events are defined for sensitive actions
- [ ] dashboard ownership is assigned
- [ ] retention and review expectations are understood
Governance and ownership readiness
Operational readiness breaks down when key decisions have no named owner.
- [ ] identity owner is known
- [ ] hosting owner is known
- [ ] telemetry owner is known
- [ ] access-review and exception owner is known
The product should have a repeatable way to revisit sensitive operational assumptions.
- [ ] access-review cadence exists
- [ ] telemetry or dashboard review cadence exists
- [ ] release readiness process includes operational checks
- [ ] internal rollout gate is documented
Risk
What this checklist is trying to prevent
A product can feel ready in demo mode while still being unready as an internal platform. This checklist helps prevent avoidable surprises around identity drift, unclear ownership, weak telemetry, and fragile runtime assumptions.
Final readiness call
- Ready for limited internal rollout
- Ready only for controlled pilot
- Not ready for broader internal usage
Notes: